New expert evidence put Bajo La Cuesta
An expert finds more errors in the survey of 2006 / Expanded demand in the TSJC to request a reconsideration
hanging over their heads While the intent of the Direccion General de Costas to demolish their homes, the 50 families living in the village Bajo La Cuesta, in the municipality of Candelaria, have reason to be optimistic. If until now had based his defense on technical errors made by the state agency in carrying out the survey of 2006, which updates the previous 1969, a new expert report expands the arguments of this group of neighbors who, under the legal advice attorney Jose Ortega, focuses its hopes on a lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of Justice of the Canary Islands (TSJC) to require a rethinking of the line state-owned land, to which it has refused flatly Coast so far. DC
/ Santa Cruz de Tenerife
A study by the architect David Rodriguez Amador, who has had access to this digital evidence is an error in the plane of demarcation, if accepted by the Ministry of Environment, would possessory recoveries void that drive costs in Bajo La Cuesta. According to data obtained by the expert, the milestones of the partition of 2006, as listed in UTM coordinates contained in a plane provided by the City Southern, do not coincide with the location given to these landmarks to draw the line of demarcation. The error reaches the point that marks not only match, but found some 170 meters offshore.
A revealing fact reinforces the theory that Valencian lawyer, who in recent years has not tired of requiring the redesign of the online state-owned land, which, in his opinion, would demonstrate that the houses of Bajo La Cuesta are outside the public domain and therefore should not be demolished.
THE TESTIMONY OF A MUNICIPAL TECHNICAL
New forensic tests that have accompanied the application in TSJC join other technical statements that support the approach advocated by Ortega. A city official, Federico Lopez of Love said at the time that the markers were taken as guidelines for the demarcation "have long been visible in the midst of houses, more or less through the center of what is now a paved road, which would make it physically impossible that the houses were within the boundary drawn a posteriori.
A statement that the Municipality of Candelaria, coincidentally in the hands of the PSOE, the Directorate General of Coasts, endorsed on the evidence of the data. The Consistory Southern issued a report earlier this year in which it supported the approach of Lopez's love in their official capacity.
But it does not stop there. Himself participated in the municipal technical when developing a plan of the town of Bajo La Cuesta, in which it is noteworthy that the houses were already visible as the line of demarcation of 1969 which was drawn precisely based on the model that provided the stones that , incidentally, were ignored when drawing the new line in 2006. The plane can be seen that the original boundary ran in front of the facades of houses, all the opposite of what Costas argued that puts the line behind the houses on the cliff (which would mean that the Villagers have survived in a temporary superhuman to waves up to 30 meters high). Both the statement
municipal technician and the plane confirms his testimony as new data extracted from Amador Rodriguez expert report are included in the complaint filed in TSJC. Ortega stressed in the letter sent to the court the "importance" and "credibility" that gives the back of City Hall, as, if not truly level, the Consistory "would not have made a commitment of this magnitude," the consequences involved in the judicial process delivering a false document.
Valencia's attorney asks the TSJC, based on the evidence in, to appoint a technician to prepare a report on the correspondence between the list of UTM coordinates of the landmarks of the boundary on May 22, 2006 (and, therefore, January 1969) and drawing on the plane. The purpose of the test, as stated by counsel in the high court wrote, is "to provide an entirely objective," to be "very technical" reasoning of the expert David Rodriguez, so ideally be supported by an legal expert.
http://www.eldigitaldecanarias.com/noticias.php?accion=detalle&id=11156
0 comments:
Post a Comment