Friday, January 28, 2011
Caught Mastrabating In Public
VIDEO 2011/01/26 Diego calls for reform of the Coastal Act to ensure the maintenance of thousands of jobs
Monday, January 24, 2011
Can Vicodin Raise Heart Rate
PP CANTABRIA RATIONALE CHARTER PARTY PEOPLE
January 22, 2011 
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, the popular party:
soon, unless capitalized surprise you are going to form a government and may, inter alia, things, review the policy costs. You know that from the platform drafted a reform bill a law, requiring, as it stands is manic, persecutory and abusive. Must change in the law, but we'll talk another day.
I think more important than changing the law is to hit a look at the templates to see which staff are able to withstand the stress test of respect for individual rights , which is much easier to do than stress testing of banks. We must apply the law, defend the beaches of speculators and must be defended for all that belongs to everyone. Yes, yes ... without cynicism or double meanings. But it is negotiable this is done keeping the respect for citizens. Believe me, ladies and gentlemen of the PP, there is much work to be done. You give me the feeling that they have no idea of \u200b\u200bthe complications that lie ahead. The family of civil engineers, channels and ports is a loving family and good avenue to participate in certain strategies, concepts and goals. Recently I was with a senior who commented that one day strayed from the dogma and compis warned him: "Hey, you're in the house."
Yes, that's the thing: You are in the house. You're one of us. Are of the sect. We're going to betray what has bitten you fly, why we do this, why do you stray, why do you think on your own, why not submit, why you no longer like us, or better as edge as us.
Just as an example: One day I had a nice chat with a Director General of Coasts and I was stiff when he heard his theory of transitional awards first. He said that would be accurate but then the thought that rescue because residential use in the public domain is prohibited by the law of costs.
Attend to this mechanism: The boundaries held a special condemnation leaves you homeless or whatever. Since Spain did not have enough money to pay compensation for such expropriation, the compensation law was invented in the form of grant and the Constitutional Court says (God knows why) that the concessions are enough fair price. Not content with that process and indecent in itself, immediately afterwards the boss of bosses said that gives the award to take it off the next day and does so on the basis of a lie, because it is true that residential use is prohibited in the public domain, so is that these concessions are an exception established by the Act because without it were otherwise there would be no compensation and we would find ourselves expropriation without compensation. And this, an expropriation without compensation, that is what promoted Director General de Costas. So donkey, so cruel and so arrogant. Passing through the arch of triumph of law, law, the Constitutional Court, the Constitution and everything. It was not a madman, a shyster or a Martian. He was the boss of bosses, who decided what was do's and don'ts in coastal policy. Sent on a well-oiled team, obedient, complacent and delivered to your leader. He is gone, but the team continues. This is what you should know (and fear) the lords and ladies of the PP.
have now heads manager Pedro Antonio Ríos . I have understood, private information, which is a good guy. In fact, I send from here, by way of greeting cryptic, a few secret codes: Zalacaín, the basins, the range of glass, the candle, Aula, South and Ipanema. Sure it takes.
What will happen to him? His subordinates distinguished it going to eat raw.
...
costasmaritimas.wordpress.com
...
purge The word is an ugly word, but you will. Or the future people's government replaced the entire team or will not change anything. Even this law so fierce it be applied in a respectful manner with citizens,
...
...
..... José Ortega
costasmaritimas
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Buy Tech Deck Replacement Trucks
New expert evidence put Bajo La Cuesta
An expert finds more errors in the survey of 2006 / Expanded demand in the TSJC to request a reconsideration
hanging over their heads While the intent of the Direccion General de Costas to demolish their homes, the 50 families living in the village Bajo La Cuesta, in the municipality of Candelaria, have reason to be optimistic. If until now had based his defense on technical errors made by the state agency in carrying out the survey of 2006, which updates the previous 1969, a new expert report expands the arguments of this group of neighbors who, under the legal advice attorney Jose Ortega, focuses its hopes on a lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of Justice of the Canary Islands (TSJC) to require a rethinking of the line state-owned land, to which it has refused flatly Coast so far. DC
/ Santa Cruz de Tenerife
A study by the architect David Rodriguez Amador, who has had access to this digital evidence is an error in the plane of demarcation, if accepted by the Ministry of Environment, would possessory recoveries void that drive costs in Bajo La Cuesta. According to data obtained by the expert, the milestones of the partition of 2006, as listed in UTM coordinates contained in a plane provided by the City Southern, do not coincide with the location given to these landmarks to draw the line of demarcation. The error reaches the point that marks not only match, but found some 170 meters offshore.
A revealing fact reinforces the theory that Valencian lawyer, who in recent years has not tired of requiring the redesign of the online state-owned land, which, in his opinion, would demonstrate that the houses of Bajo La Cuesta are outside the public domain and therefore should not be demolished.
THE TESTIMONY OF A MUNICIPAL TECHNICAL
New forensic tests that have accompanied the application in TSJC join other technical statements that support the approach advocated by Ortega. A city official, Federico Lopez of Love said at the time that the markers were taken as guidelines for the demarcation "have long been visible in the midst of houses, more or less through the center of what is now a paved road, which would make it physically impossible that the houses were within the boundary drawn a posteriori.
A statement that the Municipality of Candelaria, coincidentally in the hands of the PSOE, the Directorate General of Coasts, endorsed on the evidence of the data. The Consistory Southern issued a report earlier this year in which it supported the approach of Lopez's love in their official capacity.
But it does not stop there. Himself participated in the municipal technical when developing a plan of the town of Bajo La Cuesta, in which it is noteworthy that the houses were already visible as the line of demarcation of 1969 which was drawn precisely based on the model that provided the stones that , incidentally, were ignored when drawing the new line in 2006. The plane can be seen that the original boundary ran in front of the facades of houses, all the opposite of what Costas argued that puts the line behind the houses on the cliff (which would mean that the Villagers have survived in a temporary superhuman to waves up to 30 meters high). Both the statement
municipal technician and the plane confirms his testimony as new data extracted from Amador Rodriguez expert report are included in the complaint filed in TSJC. Ortega stressed in the letter sent to the court the "importance" and "credibility" that gives the back of City Hall, as, if not truly level, the Consistory "would not have made a commitment of this magnitude," the consequences involved in the judicial process delivering a false document.
Valencia's attorney asks the TSJC, based on the evidence in, to appoint a technician to prepare a report on the correspondence between the list of UTM coordinates of the landmarks of the boundary on May 22, 2006 (and, therefore, January 1969) and drawing on the plane. The purpose of the test, as stated by counsel in the high court wrote, is "to provide an entirely objective," to be "very technical" reasoning of the expert David Rodriguez, so ideally be supported by an legal expert.
http://www.eldigitaldecanarias.com/noticias.php?accion=detalle&id=11156 
hanging over their heads While the intent of the Direccion General de Costas to demolish their homes, the 50 families living in the village Bajo La Cuesta, in the municipality of Candelaria, have reason to be optimistic. If until now had based his defense on technical errors made by the state agency in carrying out the survey of 2006, which updates the previous 1969, a new expert report expands the arguments of this group of neighbors who, under the legal advice attorney Jose Ortega, focuses its hopes on a lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of Justice of the Canary Islands (TSJC) to require a rethinking of the line state-owned land, to which it has refused flatly Coast so far. DC
/ Santa Cruz de Tenerife
A study by the architect David Rodriguez Amador, who has had access to this digital evidence is an error in the plane of demarcation, if accepted by the Ministry of Environment, would possessory recoveries void that drive costs in Bajo La Cuesta. According to data obtained by the expert, the milestones of the partition of 2006, as listed in UTM coordinates contained in a plane provided by the City Southern, do not coincide with the location given to these landmarks to draw the line of demarcation. The error reaches the point that marks not only match, but found some 170 meters offshore.
A revealing fact reinforces the theory that Valencian lawyer, who in recent years has not tired of requiring the redesign of the online state-owned land, which, in his opinion, would demonstrate that the houses of Bajo La Cuesta are outside the public domain and therefore should not be demolished.
THE TESTIMONY OF A MUNICIPAL TECHNICAL
New forensic tests that have accompanied the application in TSJC join other technical statements that support the approach advocated by Ortega. A city official, Federico Lopez of Love said at the time that the markers were taken as guidelines for the demarcation "have long been visible in the midst of houses, more or less through the center of what is now a paved road, which would make it physically impossible that the houses were within the boundary drawn a posteriori.
A statement that the Municipality of Candelaria, coincidentally in the hands of the PSOE, the Directorate General of Coasts, endorsed on the evidence of the data. The Consistory Southern issued a report earlier this year in which it supported the approach of Lopez's love in their official capacity.
But it does not stop there. Himself participated in the municipal technical when developing a plan of the town of Bajo La Cuesta, in which it is noteworthy that the houses were already visible as the line of demarcation of 1969 which was drawn precisely based on the model that provided the stones that , incidentally, were ignored when drawing the new line in 2006. The plane can be seen that the original boundary ran in front of the facades of houses, all the opposite of what Costas argued that puts the line behind the houses on the cliff (which would mean that the Villagers have survived in a temporary superhuman to waves up to 30 meters high). Both the statement
municipal technician and the plane confirms his testimony as new data extracted from Amador Rodriguez expert report are included in the complaint filed in TSJC. Ortega stressed in the letter sent to the court the "importance" and "credibility" that gives the back of City Hall, as, if not truly level, the Consistory "would not have made a commitment of this magnitude," the consequences involved in the judicial process delivering a false document.
Valencia's attorney asks the TSJC, based on the evidence in, to appoint a technician to prepare a report on the correspondence between the list of UTM coordinates of the landmarks of the boundary on May 22, 2006 (and, therefore, January 1969) and drawing on the plane. The purpose of the test, as stated by counsel in the high court wrote, is "to provide an entirely objective," to be "very technical" reasoning of the expert David Rodriguez, so ideally be supported by an legal expert.
http://www.eldigitaldecanarias.com/noticias.php?accion=detalle&id=11156
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)